Mortarless interlocking 390x190x190 mm CMU system. Minimum compressive strength 10–20 MPa, dry density >1800 kg/m³, FRL up to 180/180/180 (grouted system). Faster installation than mortared blockwork; reduced skill requirement; approximately $4–8 per block ($40–90/m² supply) with lower labour costs than conventional CMU.
01 Physical
02 Mechanical
03 Thermal
04 Compliance & Fire First question
05 Sustainability & Health
06 Durability · Cost · Logistics
07 Assessment
Advantages
- Mortarless dry-stack above first course — eliminates mortar mixing, reduces waste and speeds construction by 30–50 % compared with conventional CMU.
- Reduced skill requirement: semi-skilled crew can achieve acceptable alignment and plumb without experienced blocklayers.
- Self-aligning tongue-and-groove profile reduces the risk of course creep and provides consistent joint geometry.
- Minimum unit compressive strength 10–20 MPa (system dependent); grouted system characteristic compressive strength 10.2 MPa per AS 3700.
- FRL up to 180/180/180 (fully grouted system); integrity/insulation up to 240 min when fully corefilled.
- High thermal mass (190 mm grouted wall ~350 kg/m²) supports passive solar design and reduces peak cooling loads.
- Acoustic performance Rw 56+ suitable for party walls and boundary applications.
- Non-combustible, inert — zero VOC, no off-gassing in service.
- Long service life (50–100+ years) with minimal maintenance.
- Readily available from national suppliers (Adbri, Austral Masonry); supply lead time 1–2 weeks.
Constraints
- First course must be set in levelling screed or mortar to establish true datum — any error propagates through all courses.
- Dimensional tolerance ±2 mm means minor face misalignment between courses; not suitable where flush fair-face finish is critical without grinding.
- Core percentage >30 % reduces net section area; grouting is required for all structural and fire-rated applications.
- FRL structural adequacy data is system-specific — consult manufacturer's Fire and Sound brochure; generic values do not apply.
- Heavier individual unit (~15.6 kg) than lightweight CMU alternatives; manual handling limits productivity for single-person crews.
- Limited range of surface textures and colours compared with standard CMU; specialist architectural finishes not generally available in interlocking profile.
- Grouting operations constrained to 5–40 °C ambient — cannot proceed in frost conditions.
- Cutting interlocking profiles with an angle grinder destroys the interlock feature; cut blocks must be placed at wall ends and corners where interlock is not required.
- Higher unit cost than conventional CMU (saving is on labour, not material); not cost-effective for small areas where setup overhead dominates.
- Not compatible with standard 10 mm mortar joint details; connection to adjacent mortared masonry, lintels and sills requires careful detailing.
08 Applications
09 Sources & Standards
Sources pending — citations for this material are not yet recorded. Verify all figures against manufacturer data and current standards before specifying.